<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ccMixter transtions from Creative Commons to ArtisTech: No business model, no thoughts &#8211; thumbs up.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostaudio.com/ccmixter-transtions-from-creative-commons-to-artistech-no-business-model-no-thoughts-thumbs-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostaudio.com/ccmixter-transtions-from-creative-commons-to-artistech-no-business-model-no-thoughts-thumbs-up/</link>
	<description>... one rant at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:28:58 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: go1dfish</title>
		<link>http://lostaudio.com/ccmixter-transtions-from-creative-commons-to-artistech-no-business-model-no-thoughts-thumbs-up/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>go1dfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostaudio.com/ccmixter-transtions-from-creative-commons-to-artistech-no-business-model-no-thoughts-thumbs-up/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Emily has drawn up some prospective business plans.  We have some ideas and general concepts that we think can lead to strong revenue sources for independent artists.

Before being approached to operate ccMixter our business model focused around facilitating multi-level paid fan-club memberships.  We still offer these at http://tunetrack.net/ and we expect that at least some ccMixter artists will want to try creating a fanclub.

Beyond that  we want to help facilitate the dual licensing of creative commons content on ccMixter (as allowed by the artists), to help facilitate an intent of:

It&#039;s cool to do what you want with my stuff so long as it&#039;s free;
but if you make mone with it you have to share it with me.

CC licenses already well address the former statement, and we hope to enable the latter.

I think it&#039;s a solid plan, but we are not arrogant enough to profess that it&#039;s&#039; *THE* way for the artists and ourselves to make a living.  We&#039;re still just recently leaving a bit of a digital music dark age and I think we just want to help bring about it&#039;s renaissance.

Now I am arrogant enough to say that the following elements are key to the success of any online musician or listener focused music site:

Rich Artwork, Liner Notes and Free Streams: http://tunetrack.net/emilyrichards/releases/one-or-ten/player/ (auto-plays music)

Full lyrics without abtrusive advertising: http://tunetrack.net/bradstanfield/releases/wizard/lyrics/2511-angels-are-crying-acoustic/

Wide variety of download formats, espescially lossless: http://tunetrack.net/emilyrichards/releases/you-give/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily has drawn up some prospective business plans.  We have some ideas and general concepts that we think can lead to strong revenue sources for independent artists.</p>
<p>Before being approached to operate ccMixter our business model focused around facilitating multi-level paid fan-club memberships.  We still offer these at <a href="http://tunetrack.net/" rel="nofollow">http://tunetrack.net/</a> and we expect that at least some ccMixter artists will want to try creating a fanclub.</p>
<p>Beyond that  we want to help facilitate the dual licensing of creative commons content on ccMixter (as allowed by the artists), to help facilitate an intent of:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s cool to do what you want with my stuff so long as it&#8217;s free;<br />
but if you make mone with it you have to share it with me.</p>
<p>CC licenses already well address the former statement, and we hope to enable the latter.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a solid plan, but we are not arrogant enough to profess that it&#8217;s&#8217; *THE* way for the artists and ourselves to make a living.  We&#8217;re still just recently leaving a bit of a digital music dark age and I think we just want to help bring about it&#8217;s renaissance.</p>
<p>Now I am arrogant enough to say that the following elements are key to the success of any online musician or listener focused music site:</p>
<p>Rich Artwork, Liner Notes and Free Streams: <a href="http://tunetrack.net/emilyrichards/releases/one-or-ten/player/" rel="nofollow">http://tunetrack.net/emilyrichards/releases/one-or-ten/player/</a> (auto-plays music)</p>
<p>Full lyrics without abtrusive advertising: <a href="http://tunetrack.net/bradstanfield/releases/wizard/lyrics/2511-angels-are-crying-acoustic/" rel="nofollow">http://tunetrack.net/bradstanfield/releases/wizard/lyrics/2511-angels-are-crying-acoustic/</a></p>
<p>Wide variety of download formats, espescially lossless: <a href="http://tunetrack.net/emilyrichards/releases/you-give/" rel="nofollow">http://tunetrack.net/emilyrichards/releases/you-give/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
